 |
| Jaime Sambrano- Sathram (R.N) |
Hello Dr. Zephyrine, my name is Jaime Sambrano- Sathram, and I am a registered nurse for over 15 years. I work at the St. Augustine Private hospital with my specialties being in medical/ surgical/ A&E nursing. I am a senior nurse in ranking and teaches nursing education.
I am currently doing my master's in nursing education, because my dream is to become a lecturer. My hobbies are reading, swimming, singing, listening to music, and playing sports. I can play just about any sport, but my favorite is martial arts and cricket. I love going to watch cricket whether its test matches, one days or T20. I absolutely love going to CPL cricket matches to support my team.
"Personal Introduction with Technology in Education: Rating my knowledge"
My journey with technology in education began during my undergraduate years, where I first encountered the transformative power of digital tools in learning environments. As a student, I experienced firsthand how interactive platforms and online resources could enhance understanding and engagement. This ignited my passion for integrating technology into educational processes.
I am currently perusing my master's degree as a nurse educator, with a focus on enhancing the use of technology in the classroom.
My goal is to effectively integrate digital tools and resources to better engage and reach students. Through my studies, I am exploring innovative educational technologies, such as online simulations, interactive learning platforms, and virtual labs. I look forward to this class as it will equip me with the skills to design and implement tech-driven learning experiences that can improve student outcomes and make nursing education more dynamic and assessable.
Throughout my career, I have kept abreast of the latest technological advancement, continuously upskilling myself through courses and workshops. This commitment has enabled me to proficiently use tools such as educational software, and emerging technologies like augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI).
I would rate my knowledge of technology as advanced. Throughout my academic and professional journey, I have consistently engaged with a variety of digital tools and platforms. I have a strong understanding of their practical applications in various learning environment. This blend of experience and ongoing learning drives my passion for leveraging technology to enhance nursing education.
What are some of the major similarities and differences among face-to-face learning, online learning and blending learning?
Strengths and Weakness of each mode of delivery?
Face to Face Learning
1. Immediate Feedback: Students can receive instant clarification on doubts and feedback on their performance.
2. Social Interaction: Promotes interpersonal skills and networking through direct interaction with peers and instructors.
3. Structured Environment: Provides a disciplined and structured learning environment, which can be beneficial for many students.
4. Hands on Activities: Easier to conduct practical and hands-on activities such as lab work, workshops, and group projects.
1. Fixed Schedule: Less flexibility in terms of time, requiring students to adhere to a specific timetable.
2. Geographical Constraints: Students need to be physically present, which can be a barrier for those living far away or with mobility issues.
3. Resources Intensive: Requires significant infrastructure, including classrooms, labs, and other facilities.
4. Cost: Can be more expensive due to travel, accommodation, and material cost.
Online Learning
1. Flexibility: Students can learn at their own pace and on their own schedule, making it accessible for those with other commitments.
2. Accessibility: Eliminates geographical barriers, allowing students from different locations to access the same courses.
3. Cost- Effective: Often more affordable due to reduced transportation and accommodation costs and sometimes lower tuition fees.
4. Wide range of resources: Provides access to vast array of online resources, including videos, articles, and interactive modules.
Weaknesses
1. Lack of Social Interaction: Limited face-to- face interaction can lead to feelings of isolation and hinder the development of social skills.
2. Self- Discipline Required: Requires a high level of self-motivation and discipline, which some students may struggle with.
3. Technical Issues: Dependent on reliable internet and technology, which can be a barrier for some students.
4. Limited Practical Experience: Harder to replicate hands-on activities and practical experiences online.
Blended Learning
Strength
1. Balanced Approached: Combines the best of both face-to- face and online learning, offering flexibility while retaining personal interaction.
2. Enhanced Engagement: Can provide a more engaging learning experience by integrating various teaching methods and tools.
3. Personalized Learning: Allows for personalized pacing and the use of different media to cater to various learning styles.
4. Resource Efficiency: Maximizes the use of both physical and digital resources, potentially reducing costs.
Weaknesses
1. Complex Implementation: Requires careful planning and coordination to integrate both online and offline components effectively.
2. Technology Dependance: Still relies heavily on technology, which can pose problems if there are technical issues.
3. Inconsistent Quality: The quality of the learning experience can vary widely depending on how well the two modes are integrated.
4. Requires Training: Instructors and students may need training to effectively use blended learning tools and platforms.
While it's challenging to declare any single mode of learning universally better than the others, due to the diverse needs and contexts of learners, one could argue that blended learning often stands out as particularly effective. Here are several reasons, supported by substantial evidence and educational theory, why blended learning can be considered superior in many contexts.
Integration of Strengths... which mode is the best????
Blending learning integrates the flexibility of online learning with the structured environment of face-to -face instruction. This allows students to benefit from the best aspects of both worlds, enabling them to manage their time effectively while still having access to schedule in person support when needed.
Studies shows that blending learning can lead to higher student engagement and motivation. The variety of teaching methods, including multimedia content online and interactive activities in- person, caters to different learning styles and keeps students more engaged than a single mode might.
Blended learning often incorporates adaptive learning technology that tailor educational content to the individual learner's pace and level. This personalization can help address individual learning needs more effectively than a one-size-fits-all approach typically found in traditional classroom settings.
Blended learning can be more inclusive, offering accommodations for students with disabilities, those in remote locations, or those with other commitments such as work or family. Online components can include features such as screen readers, subtitles, and flexible scheduling, which make learning more accessible.
In a digital age, blended learning helps students develop essential digital literacy skills. By navigating online platforms and using digital tools for learning, students are better prepared for the technological demands of the modern workplace.
While the effectiveness of learning modes can depend on specific contexts and individual preferences, blending learning often emerges as a particularly effective approach due to its inability to combine the strengths of both the face-to-face and online learning. It offers a balanced, flexible, and personalized learning experience that can lead to higher engagement, better accessibility. This makes blended learning a compelling choice for many educational institutions and learners.
References
1. Ayu R. Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Challenge (SWOC) Analysis Blended Learning for EFL Classroom: A Library Research (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Pare pare).
2. Barnett-Queen T, Blair R, Merrick M. Student perspectives of online discussions: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2005 Aug 4;23(3-4):229-44.
3. McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of advanced nursing. 2015 Feb;71(2):255-70.
4. Nasution AK, Surbakti AH, Zakaria R, Wahyuningsih SK, Daulay LA. Face to face learning vs blended learning vs online learning (student perception of learning). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2021 Feb 1 (Vol. 1783, No. 1, p. 012112). IOP Publishing.
5. Nayci Ö. Student opinions regarding strengths and weaknesses of face to face and online teaching. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020.
6. Valiathan P. Blended learning models. Learning circuits. 2002 Aug;3(8):50-9.